Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 143W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +2010%
4.813 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Feb 2007
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
320MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
320bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
20
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
143W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
G80
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy