Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (2600MHz vs 2350MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50
4.813 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +563%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Nov 2023
Alchemist
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
48
1024
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Navi 32
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Navi 32
Generation 12.7
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
190W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy