Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 124% (2350MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +497%
4.813 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Oct 2013
Alchemist
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Oland
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy