Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 153% (2350MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +405%
4.813 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Dec 2013
Alchemist
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Cape Verde
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy