Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 154% (2350MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +154%
4.813 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2015
Alchemist
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Pitcairn
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy