Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 106W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +967%
4.813 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
0.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2012
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
1024
Shading Units
144
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
106W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GF116
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy