Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A60M vs AMD FirePro M5950

Intel Arc Pro A60M vs AMD FirePro M5950

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1568 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M5950 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60M +665%
5.325 TFLOPS
FirePro M5950
0.696 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Jan 2011
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
2048
Shading Units
480
128
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.800 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.40 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
696.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-256
GPU Name
Whistler
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
Whistler XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.716 billion
Unknown
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

95W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy