Intel Arc Pro A60M vs AMD FirePro M6000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60M
+420%
5.325 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2023
Release Date
Jul 2012
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
43W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-256
GPU Name
Heathrow
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
