Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +860%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jan 2015
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
6144
Shading Units
512
192
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.97 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1151 GFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.97 GFLOPS

Board Design

350W
TDP
45W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-860-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy