Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +1195%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jul 2014
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
6144
Shading Units
640
192
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

350W
TDP
65W
750 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy