Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1519MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +611%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000 Mobile
1.555 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Feb 2017
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Pascal-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1493 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1519 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
512
192
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.30 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.61 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.30 GFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.555 TFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.61 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
N18P-Q1-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

350W
TDP
40W
750 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy