Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 32GB VRAM Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 204.8GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +314%
13.82 TFLOPS
Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB
3.333 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Feb 2023
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
LPDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
204.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
7680
Shading Units
1792
240
TMUs
56
120
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
56
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.32 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.08 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.666 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.333 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.667 TFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
40W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA10B
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
190 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy