Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2070 Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +1244%
13.82 TFLOPS
Tesla M2070 Q
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
7680
Shading Units
448
240
TMUs
56
120
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-876-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy