Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 1536MB VRAM Quadro Plex 2100 S4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
8064 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (500W vs 640W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +4163%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro Plex 2100 S4
0.346 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Plex
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
8192
Shading Units
128
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
640W
900 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G80
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
90 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy