Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
7744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +1334%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
8192
Shading Units
448
256
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-876-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy