CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+3092%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro FX 4800
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
8192
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy