Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA NVS 300

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
24 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.64GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
Lower TDP (18W vs 20W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP +7%
0.042 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2011
Radeon R600
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
40
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
18W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GT218
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy