Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY +16966%
7.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jul 2015
Radeon R600
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.168 TFLOPS
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.168 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
448.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Fiji
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
GPU Variant
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy