Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs AMD FireStream 9170

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 105W)
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170 +1083%
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2007
Radeon R600
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
105W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
RV670
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy