Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 106W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.73GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 +1330%
0.601 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Sep 2010
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
40
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.264 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
601.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.11 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
106W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GF106
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
GF106-250-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy