Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630 +4252%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jun 2022
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1740 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
40
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
TU117
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy