Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +4252%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2016
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GM206
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy