Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 465 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 200W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.7GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
312 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 465 +1935%
0.855 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2010
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
102.7GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
11
40
Shading Units
352
4
TMUs
44
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.38 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.75 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
855.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
106.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GF100
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
GF100-030-A3
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy