Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +13538%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2017
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Ellesmere
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy