Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
40 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A +150%
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
May 2010
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
495 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
7.920GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
1
40
Shading Units
80
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
31.84 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
M93
-
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy