Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 375W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.4GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 +3268%
1.078 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
495 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1536MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
7.920GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
40
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
-
-
-
31.84 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy