Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.00GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
8 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (19W vs 20W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
NVS 315 +212%
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Mar 2013
Radeon R600
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
495 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
7.920GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
31.84 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
19W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy