Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +3800%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
495 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
7.920GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
31.84 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy