Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD FirePro S7150

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
1928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 +2534%
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Feb 2016
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Tonga
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
5 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy