Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD FireStream 9250

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250 +599%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon R600
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
800
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
RV770
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy