Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.67GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP +580%
0.143 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Dec 2007
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
120
Shading Units
8
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
G98
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy