Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition +334%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Feb 2010
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
120
Shading Units
240
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
219W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
G92B
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy