Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 375W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.4GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 +653%
1.078 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1536MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
120
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GF100
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy