Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300 +2853%
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Aug 2020
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Navi 14
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy