Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
2952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +22242%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2023
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
48
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Navi 32
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Navi 32
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy