Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 800W)
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
18312 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
TITAN Ada +64865%
92.9 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
1152GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
144
120
Shading Units
18432
8
TMUs
576
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
800W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
AD102
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy