ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
24 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 630
+115%
0.311 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
120
Shading Units
96
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.240 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
311.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
25.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GF108
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
GF108-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
