Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 5970 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

ATI Radeon HD 5970 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 5970 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 5970 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 294W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 5970 +332%
2.32 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
Sep 2008
Evergreen
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
1600
Shading Units
216
80
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.320 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

294W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hemlock
GPU Name
GT200
Hemlock XT (215-0735075)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy