Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD FirePro D300

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
15616 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +2752%
62.08 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Jan 2014
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
-
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
1280
528
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
32
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
50 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

1000W
TDP
150W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Blackwell
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
208 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy