NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

VS

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages

Released 10 years and 10 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1837MHz vs 1032MHz)

More VRAM (96GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 144.2GB/s)

16128 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages

Lower TDP (134W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

B200 SXM 192 GB +3816%

62.08 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

1.585 TFLOPS

B200 SXM 192 GB

VS

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Graphics Card

Jan 2024

Release Date

Mar 2013

Tesla Blackwell

Generation

GeForce 600

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 5.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz

Base Clock

980 MHz

1837 MHz

Boost Clock

1032 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1502 MHz

Memory

96GB

Memory Size

2GB

HBM3e

Memory Type

GDDR5

4096bit

Memory Bus

192bit

4100GB/s

Bandwidth

144.2GB/s

Render Config

132

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

16896

Shading Units

768

528

TMUs

64

24

ROPs

24

528

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

256 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per SMX)

50 MB

L2 Cache

384 KB

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

16.51 GPixel/s

969.9 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

66.05 GTexel/s

248.3 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

62.08 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1.585 TFLOPS

31.04 TFLOPS

FP64 (double)

66.05 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GB100

GPU Name

GK106

-

GPU Variant

GK106-240-A1

Blackwell

Architecture

Kepler

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

28 nm

208 billion

Transistors

2.54 billion

Unknown

Die Size

221 mm²

Board Design

1000W

TDP

134W

1400 W

Suggested PSU

300 W

No outputs

Outputs

2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2

-

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

N/A

DirectX

12 (11_0)

N/A

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

1.1

9.0

CUDA

3.0

N/A

Shader Model

5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition

2

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM

3

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 3870 Mac Edition

4

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 590 GME

5

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs ATI FirePro V7800

6

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

7

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

8

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM

9

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB GA104

10

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 OEM

Related News

1

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

2

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

3

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

4

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

5

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

6

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

7

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

8

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

9

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

10

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W