Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 60% (1837MHz vs 1147MHz)
More VRAM (96GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 829.4GB/s)
11776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210
11.75 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +428%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Jan 2024
Mining GPUs
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
1665 MHz
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
810 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
96GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM3e
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
132
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
16896
320
TMUs
528
128
ROPs
24
640
Tensor Cores
528
-
RT Cores
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GB100
-
GPU Variant
-
Volta
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
208 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

250W
TDP
1000W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
9.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy