Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs ATI FireMV 2250

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Jan 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
-
320
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
RV516
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy