Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD FirePro S7150

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210 +211%
11.75 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Feb 2016
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
2048
320
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
32
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
Volta
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
5 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.0
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy