Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD FirePro W4300

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210 +722%
11.75 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Dec 2015
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
5120
Shading Units
768
320
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
16
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
Bonaire
-
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
Volta
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.0
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy