Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210 +58650%
11.75 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Jul 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
1
5120
Shading Units
8
320
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.080 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.68 GFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
8400GS-225-B1
Volta
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy