CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1147MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
5088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210
+12955%
11.75 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
0.09 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210
VS
GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jan 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
80
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
32
320
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.60 GFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GV100
GPU Name
G96C
-
GPU Variant
-
Volta
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
2
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs Intel Arc Pro A50
3
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs ATI FirePro V3800
4
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA T1000 8 GB
5
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon RX 550 512SP
6
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
7
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD FirePro W4100
8
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs ATI FireGL V3600
9
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP
10
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy