Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon R9 270

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon R9 270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1147MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210 +396%
11.75 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270
2.368 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Nov 2013
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
810 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
5120
Shading Units
1280
320
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.00 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.368 TFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
Curacao
-
GPU Variant
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
Volta
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.0
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy