CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
VS
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
AMD Radeon R9 295X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210
+104%
11.75 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2
5.733 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210
VS
Radeon R9 295X2
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Apr 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
44
5120
Shading Units
2816
320
TMUs
176
128
ROPs
64
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GV100
GPU Name
Vesuvius
-
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
Volta
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.0
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
2
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
3
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
5
Intel Arc A580 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
6
AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
8
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D
9
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
10
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA NVS 310
Related News
1
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
2
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
3
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
4
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
5
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
6
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
7
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
8
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
9
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
10
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy