Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210 +104%
11.75 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Apr 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
44
5120
Shading Units
2816
320
TMUs
176
128
ROPs
64
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
Vesuvius
-
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
Volta
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.0
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy