Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs Intel Arc A350

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (2000MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +311%
12.63 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4480
Shading Units
768
280
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
24
280
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
DG2-128
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy