Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD Radeon R9 280

NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (1785MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (125W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX +50%
5.027 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Mar 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
827 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
933 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
1792
88
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
200W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Tahiti
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy